India vs Australia Test Match: BCCI will appeal Yashavi Jaiswal’s catch in ICC

India vs Australia Test Match: BCCI will appeal to ICC against the wrong out given to Yashvi Jaiswal. Jaiswal was given out controversially on the fifth day of the test match. Due to which India suffered a crushing defeat, no edge of the bat was visible in the meter. According to technology, Jaiswal was not out, yet he was given out, due to which India lost the test match

The BCCI will formally protest the decision to release Yashasvi Jaiswal. Pat Cummins’ delivery caught Yashasvi Jaiswal behind the wicket, resulting in his dismissal. The third umpire overturned the on-field umpire’s decision to declare it not out. Sharafuddaula Saikat, an umpire from Bangladesh, is in charge of third umpiring. He was given two pieces of evidence to consider before making a judgement. Snicko meter first, followed by visual proof. The umpire ruled Yashasvi out based on the ball’s proximity to the gloves and the deflection, although Sharafuddaula did not hear any touch between the bat and the ball in the snicko meter.

“You are using technology while making decisions,” stated Sunil Gavaskar, who was commentating throughout the game. The snicko meter made it quite evident that he was not out. This choice is totally incorrect. In a highly stressful scenario, you made a decision under pressure. Yashasvi’s dismissal was entirely incorrect because the umpire could not obtain any concrete proof that he was out. The batsman shall always be given the “benefit of doubt” in accordance with ICC Cricket Rule 31.6. This means that an umpire should declare a batsman “not out” if he is not sure if the batsman is out. This is because the batsman should not be dismissed on a minor call and only gets one opportunity to play the innings.

In accordance with ICC regulations, the field umpire’s call is also very important during DRS. When making a decision, the field umpire’s declaration of not out is also taken into account. The third umpire’s decision is also influenced by whether the umpire has declared out. The umpire’s call during DRS determines the outcome of LBW calls. In the opening game of the series, there was also a dispute over the wicket. The removal of KL Rahul during India’s opening innings in the first game caused debate. Rahul attempted to defend the second ball that Starc bowled in the twenty-third over. Alex Carey, the wicketkeeper, caught the ball as it passed close to his bat. The umpire refused to give in despite the appeals of the entire Australian side.

Pat Cummins, the Australian skipper, reviewed Rahul. The snickometer showed movement even though the distance between the bat and the ball was readily visible from the back camera perspective when the replay was displayed in the review. The third umpire nevertheless ruled KL Rahul out. Based on the snickometer, the third umpire made this determination. Commentators Jatin Sapru, Irfan Pathan, and Sunil Gavaskar questioned why, if snickometer technology was the foundation for Rahul’s decision, it was disregarded in Yashasvi’s decision following the third umpire’s ruling on him in the fourth Test. What led to the adoption of this double standard? In the seventieth over, Yashasvi was out. The score for Team India was 140 runs at 7 wickets. India was dismissed for 155 runs in the following 8 overs. The Melbourne Test was lost by Team India. Do you believe that India paid a price for the deceit committed with Yashasvi Jaiswal?